Drawing for ARTCOSMETICS

USPTO serial 79215677

ARTCOSMETICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ARTCOSMETICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stewart J. Bellus

STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD AND ROE1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003CosmeticsABANDONED—
040Custom manufacture of cosmeticsABANDONED—
042Research and development in the cosmetic fieldABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 27, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 14, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2020FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 22, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2019MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 20, 2019ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 20, 2019OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 20, 2019OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 1, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 13, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2018RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 9, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 5, 2018OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Apr 5, 2018OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Dec 20, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 5, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 22, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 22, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 15, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 27, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 16, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 20, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 16, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 15, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 8, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance