Drawing for ORIGIN

USPTO serial 79215719

ORIGIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ORIGIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tanja Proehl

Tanja Proehl Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.300 S. Wacker DriveSuite 2500Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Sound amplifying apparatus; electrical and electronic apparatus and instruments, all for audio amplification, for the graphic equalisation of sound signal frequencies, for mixing sound tones, altering sound tones, or effecting echo, delay and other effects; sound amplifiers; amplifiers for sound reproducing equipment for use with musical instruments; amplifiers; apparatus for controlling amplifiers; none of the aforesaid being or related to computer or video games, online games or online entertainment, or computer game, or video game or interactive entertainment software on any mediumACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 28, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 25, 2021FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 7, 2021FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 7, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 7, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 25, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 25, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 25, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 29, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 28, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 6, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 6, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 1, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 13, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 2, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 19, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 20, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 14, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 13, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 8, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance