USPTO serial 79215888
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MEGHAN E. PRATSCHLER
1417 S FAIRFAX STDENVER, CO 80222UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management consultancy services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Insurance brokerage; insurance agencies; financial and investment services, namely, asset and investment acquisition, consultation, advisory and development; financial advisory and consultancy services in the field of health care | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and writing of computer software; maintenance, repair, and implementation of computer software for use in the field of health care; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of health care computer software problems via telephone, on-site and electronic communication; monitoring health care services for medical technology quality control purposes; providing on-line non-downloadable software for automating administrative, clinical, and healthcare financial processes, and conducting health related transactions via communication networks and computer; providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in the field of health care, namely, software for analyzing, building, communicating, distributing, editing, integrating, maintaining, managing, monitoring, organizing, referencing, processing, reviewing, sharing, storing, and structuring health care information; hosting an online community website featuring blogs, collaboration and Internet sites, electronic bulletin boards, web logs, and web portals in the fields of health care and insurance | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2022 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 5, 2022 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | DCPN | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2017 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2017 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |