Drawing for VERVIG

USPTO serial 79215888

VERVIG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 774
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MITTLER, ROBIN M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VERVIG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MEGHAN E. PRATSCHLER

1417 S FAIRFAX STDENVER, CO 80222UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management consultancy servicesACTIVE—
036Insurance brokerage; insurance agencies; financial and investment services, namely, asset and investment acquisition, consultation, advisory and development; financial advisory and consultancy services in the field of health careACTIVE—
042Design and writing of computer software; maintenance, repair, and implementation of computer software for use in the field of health care; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of health care computer software problems via telephone, on-site and electronic communication; monitoring health care services for medical technology quality control purposes; providing on-line non-downloadable software for automating administrative, clinical, and healthcare financial processes, and conducting health related transactions via communication networks and computer; providing on-line non-downloadable software for use in the field of health care, namely, software for analyzing, building, communicating, distributing, editing, integrating, maintaining, managing, monitoring, organizing, referencing, processing, reviewing, sharing, storing, and structuring health care information; hosting an online community website featuring blogs, collaboration and Internet sites, electronic bulletin boards, web logs, and web portals in the fields of health care and insuranceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 2022CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Feb 5, 2022CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 12, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 12, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2019DCPNCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 1, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 13, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2018RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 22, 2018OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2018OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Dec 26, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 2017NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 7, 2017RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 3, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 27, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 21, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 19, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 18, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 11, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance