Drawing for JEFORMA

USPTO serial 79215913

JEFORMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5557672Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 11, 2018
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JEFORMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Perla M. Kuhn

Perla M. Kuhn Fox Rothschild LLP997 Lenox Drive, Building 3Princeton Pike Corporate CenterLAWRENCEVILLE, NJ 08648-2311

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Iron and steel, all being unwrought or semi-wrought; steel in sheet, pipe, tube, plate, bar, billet, bloom, slab and rail form; steel pipes and tubes for pipelines; building and construction materials of metal, namely, metal door frames, steel frames for building, metal window frames, metal greenhouse frames, metal ceiling panels, metal roofing panels, wall panels of metal, metal door panels and metal fence panels; prefabricated buildings made substantially of metal; containers of metal for transport; industrial packaging containers of metal, other than metal stoppers, lids and caps; metal fluid storage tanks; industrial water storage tanks of metal; loading and unloading pallets of metal; metal turntables for load handling, namely, loading pallets of metalSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2026INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 29, 2026INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2026INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 28, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 19, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2025C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 11, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 15, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 11, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 26, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 6, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 10, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 10, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 3, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
May 2, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 2, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 19, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 7, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 21, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 19, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 19, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 18, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2017LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance