Drawing for PIXELPIN

USPTO serial 79215968

PIXELPIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5619535Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 4, 2018
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIXELPIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stacy J. Grossman

STACY J GROSSMAN LAW OFFICE OF STACY J GROSSMAN888 SEVENTH AVENUE10TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10106-6120

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer peripheral devices for authentication; downloadable middleware for authenticating user identification; recorded computer operating programs for authentication; computer software for controlling and managing access server applications; anti-piracy software; decoder software; computer memory devices; blank smart cards; memory cards; downloadable cloud-based software for storing and managing electronic data; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of newsletters, manual and articles in the field of on-line data privacy and securitySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
038Information transmission by telematic codes; computer transmission of information accessed via a code or a terminal; signal transmission for electronic commerce via telecommunication systems and data communication systems; communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers; electronic transmission of facsimile communications and data featuring encryption and decryption; telecommunications services, namely, wireless telephony and wireless broadband communications services for the transmission of voice and data; wireless electronic transmission of data and pictures via near field communication (NFC) technology-enabled deviceSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Providing electronic verification of on-line orders of digital content and generating electronic permission codes which then allow users to access said digital content; computer code conversion for others: electronic signature verification services using technology to authenticate user identity; design and development of computer software for secure storage and transmission of data; services for maintenance of computer software; design and writing of computer software for authentication; computer programming for authentication; computer software consultancy for authentication; computer security threat analysis for protecting data; design and development of wireless communication systems for transmission and reception of voice, data and video; computer security threat analysis for protecting data; data encryption services for providing security and anonymity for electronically transmitted credit card transactionsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2026INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2026INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 20, 2026INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 20, 2025C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 4, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2019LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Mar 29, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 8, 2019LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 7, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 7, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 4, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 26, 2019LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 28, 2018LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 4, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 28, 2018TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Oct 28, 2018OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 28, 2018OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jul 20, 2018RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 2, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 25, 2018OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2018OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Jan 25, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 22, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 6, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 6, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 11, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 9, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2017RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 28, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 26, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 25, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 11, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2017LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance