Drawing for DIGITAL TISSUE

USPTO serial 79216210

DIGITAL TISSUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5505491Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 3, 2018
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGITAL TISSUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Theodore A. Breiner

Theodore A. Breiner BREINER & BREINER, L.L.C.115 North Henry StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for paper converting, namely, machines for paper cutting, rolling and winding, embossing, printing, unwinding, gluing, interfolding, folding and machines for packaging, namely, machines for wrapping, bundling, rollers for machines for paper converting; computerized machines for paper converting, namely, machines for paper cutting, rolling and winding, embossing, printing, unwinding, gluing, interfolding, folding and machines for packaging, namely, machines for wrapping, bundling; machines for the manufacture of toilet paper rolls; machines for the manufacture of toilet paper and napkinsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
016Toilet paper; paper kitchen towels; paper for paper napkins; tissue paper for the manufacture of toilet paper; paper napkins and paper handkerchiefsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2026INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 4, 2026INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 4, 2026INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 17, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 17, 2025C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 16, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 3, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 2, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 11, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 11, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 3, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 17, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2018PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 30, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 23, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 22, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 14, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance