Drawing for AMA UNIVERSAL

USPTO serial 79216234

AMA UNIVERSAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLLACK, ALISON FRIEDBERG
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMA UNIVERSAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Curtis Krechevsky

Curtis Krechevsky Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines, appliances and installations washing, namely, wet-cleaning washing machines, washing machines for clothes, machines and installations for dry cleaning, namely, dry cleaning machines, washing machines and installations utilising water, namely, wet-cleaning washing machines, washing machines for household purposes, washing machines for clothes, washing machines, machines for washing metals being washing machine for industrial parts, liquid coolers specially adapted for vehicle washing installations, ironing machines, namely, mangles, electric clothing pressing machines, smoothing presses, metal and ground surface finishing machines, chemical fiber drying machines, conveyors, bagging machines, pneumatically-controlled manikins being industrial robot, wet-cleaning washers incorporating dryers for removing stains and cleaning clothes and fabrics using air and water under high pressure, appliances for laundries, namely, wringing machines for laundrySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
009Computer hardware and software for mending and identifying items of clothing, fabrics and textile products during washing and dry-cleaning processes, computer peripheral apparatus and components and accessories for said products, namely, sensor activated for use in clothing dryersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
011Coolers for liquids, namely, water coolers, filters for water filters, filters for air extractor hoods, steam generators, drying appliances, namely, laundry drying machines, electric laundry dryers, clothes dryers, machines and appliances for dry-cleaningSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 22, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 7, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 1, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 13, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 7, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 11, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 11, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 11, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 20, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 6, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 21, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 19, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 16, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 15, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2017SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance