USPTO serial 79216290
KATO IMER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KATO IMER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Elevators; bitumen making machines; earth moving machines; compressors; concrete mixers machines; control mechanisms for machines, engines or motors; cutting machines; excavators; gear boxes or drive mechanisms other than for land vehicles; current generators; pneumatic hammers; hoists; machine tools; lubricators parts of machines; electric motors, not for land vehicles; pumps machines; reduction gears, other than for land vehicles; saws machines; conveyors machines; earth compacting machines; construction machines; road making machines; lifting apparatus; compact crawler-tracked transporters; hydraulic hammers | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Land vehicles; industrial land vehicles; trucks; concrete mixing vehicles; dump trucks; platform trucks; fork lift trucks; concrete pumps vehicles; concrete conveyor belt motor vehicles; tractors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 12, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 11, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |