USPTO serial 79216299
SUNLAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 29, 2019
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUNLAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Dongguan Sunland Technology Co., LTD
Dongguan City, CN
Other trademarks owned by Dongguan Sunland Technology Co., LTD
Dongguan Sunland Technology Co., LTD
Dongguan City, CN
Other trademarks owned by Dongguan Sunland Technology Co., LTD
Dongguan Sunland Technology Co., LTD
Dongguan City, CN
Other trademarks owned by Dongguan Sunland Technology Co., LTD
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Flower pots; sprinklers for watering flowers and plants; window-boxes; vases; covers, not of paper, for flower pots; flower pot holders, namely, holders for flowers and plants for flower arranging; watering cans; trash cans; candlesticks; indoor terrariums for plant cultivation | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dongguan Sunland Technology Co., LTD
- Other trademarks owned by Dongguan Sunland Technology Co., LTD
- Other trademarks owned by Dongguan Sunland Technology Co., LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named SUNLAND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2026 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 21, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 13, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 9, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 22, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2018 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |