Drawing for STILNOLOGY

USPTO serial 79216315

STILNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5572577Status 708Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 2, 2018
Examiner
HENRY, NAKIA D
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with STILNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PRESTON SMIRMAN

PRESTON SMIRMAN SMIRMAN IP LAW, PLLCP.O. BOX 80364ROCHESTER, MI 48308United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018[ Leather and imitations of leather; animal skins; trunks and travelling bags; travelling trunks; barrel bags; leather travelling bags; business card cases; notecases, namely, carrying cases; briefcases; key cases; garment bags for travel; synthetic fur; pocket wallets; coin holders in the nature of wallets; chamois leather, other than for cleaning purposes ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing, namely, shirts and jackets; footwear, headgear, namely, hats; jumper dresses; bathing suits; berets; short-sleeve shirts; shirts; hats; coats; belts for clothing; money belts as clothing; neck bands as parts of clothing; detachable collars; ready-made clothing, namely, linings being parts of clothing; neckties; jackets as clothing; blousons; skirts; gloves as clothing; clothing made of imitations of leather, namely, windbreakers; clothing of leather, namely, jackets; knitwear clothing, namely, sweaters; hosiery; muffs as clothing; trousers; parkas; furs as clothing; ponchos; sweaters; shoes; overcoats; half-boots; boots; fur stoles; tee-shirtsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2026INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 4, 2026INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2026INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 10, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 10, 2025NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2025C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 10, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 3, 2024ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2021ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jul 10, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 10, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 15, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 14, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 2, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 20, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 17, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 4, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 27, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2018PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 11, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 28, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 28, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 23, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 23, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 17, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
May 16, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 16, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 16, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 20, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 7, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 21, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 19, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 19, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 18, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance