Drawing for ADDITIVE.DESIGNER

USPTO serial 79216316

ADDITIVE.DESIGNER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADDITIVE.DESIGNER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGNED FOR USE IN MANUFACTURING, NAMELY, FOR USE IN METAL BASED 3D PRINTING; COMPUTER-AIDED MANUFACTURING SOFTWARE, NAMELY, FOR METAL BASED 3D PRINTING; SOFTWARE, NAMELY, FOR METAL BASED 3D PRINTINGACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 18, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 11, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 5, 2020FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 15, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 8, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 8, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 8, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 20, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 20, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 14, 2019EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 19, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 24, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 15, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 15, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 15, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 5, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 13, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 13, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 13, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 23, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 22, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 22, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 20, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 19, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 15, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance