USPTO serial 79216370
LA RUTA DE VIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5614017Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 27, 2018
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with LA RUTA DE VIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yaling Zhou
Yaling Zhou ZYL LAW FIRM LLC101 Nicoll StreetNew Haven, CT 06511United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Imitation leather; pocket wallets; travelling trunks; rucksacks; handbags; key cases; bags, namely, athletic bags; umbrellas; walking sticks; clothing for pets | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts; skirts; underwear; shoes; headgear for wear, namely, hats; hosiery; gloves as clothing; shawls; girdles; sleep masks | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising; on-line advertising on a computer network; organization and conducting product presentations via communication media, for retail purposes; commercial administration of the licensing of the goods and services of others; outsourcing services; import-export agency services; sales promotion for others; procurement services, namely, purchasing shoes and handbags for other businesses; provision of an on-line marketplace for buyers and sellers of goods and services; personnel management consultancy; systemization of information into computer databases; retail and wholesale store services featuring pharmaceutical, veterinary and sanitary preparations and medical supplies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hu Jianping
- Other trademarks owned by Hu Jianping
- Other trademarks owned by Hu Jianping
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named LA RUTA DE VIA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2025 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2025 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Apr 14, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 25, 2024 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 24, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 11, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2017 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 14, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2017 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2017 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |