Drawing for INFRAKIT

USPTO serial 79216436

INFRAKIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5547826Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 28, 2018
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with INFRAKIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Geza C. Ziegler Jr.

Geza C. Ziegler Jr. ZIEGLER IP LAW GROUP LLC.3135 Easton TurnpikeSHU i-Hub, W-256Fairfield, CT 06825

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and software applications for the collection, transmission, processing, and analysis of data in the fields of engineering and construction; computer software and software applications for the collection, transmission, processing, management, and analysis of data; computer software and software applications for use in the construction industry for the collection, transmission, processing, and analysis of data; computer software and software applications for use in project management, specifically for the collection, transmission, processing, and analysis of data in the fields of engineering and constructionACTIVE—
042Scientific and technological services relating to computer software, namely, development of computer software used for collection, transmission, processing, and analysis of data in the fields of engineering and construction; development of computer programs; technical consultancy relating to computer software; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for the collection, transmission, processing, and analysis of data in the fields of engineering and construction; development of software relating to project management; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in project management, specifically for the collection, transmission, processing, and analysis of data; development of computer software for the construction industry; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in the construction industry for the collection, transmission, processing and analysis of dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2024NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 202471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 2, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 8, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2024ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 28, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 10, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 28, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 27, 2018LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW—
Jul 13, 2018LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 12, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 23, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 9, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 9, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 9, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 9, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 8, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 7, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 7, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 5, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 10, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 28, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 26, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 25, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 15, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance