Drawing for MONITRAV DYNAMIC LOCATION & DIRECTION SCHEDULER

USPTO serial 79216493

MONITRAV DYNAMIC LOCATION & DIRECTION SCHEDULER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5510452Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 10, 2018
Examiner
OLANDRIA, WARREN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONITRAV DYNAMIC LOCATION & DIRECTION SCHEDULER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisel M. Ferguson

Lisel M. Ferguson Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Position reference systems comprising software, hardware, cameras, lasers, radio-frequency identification (RFID) apparatus, and beacons for use in directing the motion, stopping and loading points for autonomous robotic vehicles, such as those used in warehouses, so that they may navigate around shelving and racking and other objects, collect specific goods from specific shelves or places, load them into a temporary container or storage device and deposit them at a defined point for onward distribution; robotic vehicle sensor systems, namely, GPS-aided and radio frequency identification (RFID) based navigation systems for use in navigating autonomous robotic vehicles within environments such as warehouses and storage areas; electronic devices for locating and tracking robotic vehicles using computer hardware, computer software and global positioning systems for use in locating autonomous robotic vehicles within environments such as warehouses and storage areas; robotic vehicle sensor systems, namely, GPS-aided and RFID-based navigation systems and electronic devices for locating and tracking robotic vehicles using computer hardware, computer software and global positioning systems comprised of laser, vision, magnetic, electromagnetic and radio frequency identification (RFID) based position reference sensors, reference targets and natural feature recognition sensors, computer hardware and computer software; laser, vision, magnetic, electromagnetic and radio frequency identification (RFID) based position reference sensors for use with control applications for robotic and autonomous vehicles; collision avoidance systems for vehicles, namely, hardware and software that track the location of a robot by reference to various beacons pre-placed within the warehouse and stops it from hitting the shelving; collision avoidance systems for vehicles comprised of laser, vision, magnetic, electromagnetic and radio frequency identification (RFID) based position reference sensors; collision avoidance systems for vehicles comprised of laser, vision, magnetic, electromagnetic and radio frequency identification (RFID) based position reference sensors, reference targets and natural feature recognition sensors, computer hardware and computer software; proximity sensors for automated guide vehicles and mobile platform control applications for robotic and autonomous vehicles; software for mapping the environment of automated guide vehicles and mobile platform control applications for robotic and autonomous vehicles; software for creating digital maps for use by automated guide vehicles and mobile platform control applications for robotic and autonomous vehicles; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods, namely, structural replacement partsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2026INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 11, 2026INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 9, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 21, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2025C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 10, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 5, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 24, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 10, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 24, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 12, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 17, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 28, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 26, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 25, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 15, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance