USPTO serial 79216589
Serial No. 79216589
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 79216589?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Prescription and non-prescription medicines, namely, pills, tablets, capsules, caplets, liquid drops, sachets and pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of cardiovascular disorders; food for babies; mineral food supplements; nutritional supplements, namely, probiotic compositions; infant formula; nutritional supplements for medical purposes; babies' napkin-pants (diaper-pants); babies' diapers (napkins) | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising services, namely, cost-per-action on-line advertising; providing television home shopping services in the field of general consumer merchandise; outsourcing services in the nature of arranging procurement of goods for others; providing business information via a web site; commercial administration of the licensing of the goods and services of others; provision of an on-line marketplace for buyers and sellers of goods and services; sales promotion for others; import-export agency services; administrative processing of purchase orders; institutional retail pharmacy services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research and development of new products for others; industrial design; architectural services; maintenance of computer software; data conversion of computer programs and data, not physical conversion; computer technology consultancy; providing information on computer technology and programming via a web site; computer software design; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for encryption, tokenization, storage, and secure transport of credit card and debit card transactions; providing search engines for the internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |