USPTO serial 79216592
SIMEONE NAPOLI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIMEONE NAPOLI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Small bags for men; gentlemen's handbags; tie cases for travel; bags; purses; handbags; suitcases; wallets; leather wallets; wallets including card holders; nappy wallets; handbags, purses and wallets; credit card cases wallets; leather bags and wallets; overnight bags; travel baggage; travel cases; bags for sports clothing; valises; small suitcases; leather suitcases; trunks and suitcases; wheeled suitcases; luggage, bags, wallets and other carriers | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing; formalwear; belts clothing; mufflers clothing; tops clothing; sportswear; gloves clothing; casualwear; menswear; jackets clothing; down jackets; smoking jackets; suit coats; shirts; casual shirts; shirt-jacs; button down shirts; dress shirts; collared shirts; trousers; dress pants; casual trousers; men's socks; tutus; outerclothing for men; coats for men; shirts for suits; dinner suits; bathing suits for men; footwear for women; men's and women's jackets, coats, trousers, vests; suits; coats for women; ladies' dresses; women's ceremonial dresses; shoes; dress shoes; cravats; footwear; footwear for men; jerseys clothing; sweaters; polo sweaters; turtleneck sweaters; collar protectors for wear; shawls and stoles; short trousers; short trousers; skirts; scarves; hats; sandals; boots; vest tops; pajamas (Am.); men's underwear; knitted underwear; slippers; rainproof jackets; long jackets; overcoats; stockings; corsets; wedding dresses; ladies' boots; ladies' underwear; swim wear for gentlemen and ladies; ladies' clothing; stocking suspenders; women's suits; women's outerclothing; waist belts; pullovers; crew neck sweaters; slipovers; hooded pullovers; long sleeve pullovers; flip-flops | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 24, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 23, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |