Drawing for DAELIMSYNOL

USPTO serial 79216676

DAELIMSYNOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5430613Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 27, 2018
Examiner
CIANCI,RYAN MICHAEL
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAELIMSYNOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Victoria Friedman

Victoria Friedman Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC230 W. Monroe St.Suite 2100Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Catalysts for use in the manufacture of rubber; chemical additives for lubricating oils; chemical additives for fuel; chemical additives to motor fuel; collagen for use as ingredient in manufacture of cosmetics; wetting agents for use in the manufacture of cosmetics; hydraulic oils; hydraulic fluids; transmission fluids; transmission oils; power steering fluidSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
004Industrial grease; Industrial lubricants; automobile lubricants; industrial oils; industrial oil; lubricating oils for industrial purposes; cutting oil for industrial metal working; grease for machines; gear oils; lubricating grease for vehicles; grease for weapons; engine oils; lubricating grease; lubricating oils and greases; lubricating oil; lubricating oil for motor vehicle engines; automotive greases; automotive engine oilsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2026INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 18, 2025INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2025INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 3, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 3, 2024NC71NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 71 E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 26, 2024PUM1OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1—
Feb 25, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 22, 2024ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2021CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 4, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 3, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 27, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 27, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 9, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 23, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 26, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 23, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 22, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 22, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance