USPTO serial 79216700
70° M&P SINCE 1946 MESSI & PAOLONI - COAXIAL CABLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5488907Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 12, 2018
- Examiner
- BESCH, JAY C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 70° M&P SINCE 1946 MESSI & PAOLONI - COAXIAL CABLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
I-60131 ANCONA, IT
I-60131 ANCONA, IT
I-60131 ANCONA, IT
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Non-electrical cables of metal | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | Wire cutters, and scissors for coaxial cables; Hand tools in the nature of cutters, namely, hand-operated cutting tools, milling cutters, pipe cutters, bar cutters, tile cutters, box cutters, safety cutters, weed cutters, glass cutters, cake cutters, bolt cutters, callus cutters, non-electric pizza cutters, French fry cutters, miter cutters; Cutting discs for use with hand operated cutting tools | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MESSI & PAOLONI SRL
- Other trademarks owned by MESSI & PAOLONI SRL
- Other trademarks owned by MESSI & PAOLONI SRL
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named 70° M&P SINCE 1946 MESSI & PAOLONI - COAXIAL CABLES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2026 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 27, 2024 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 13, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 4, 2018 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |