USPTO serial 79216923
MILADA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5472209Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 22, 2018
- Examiner
- DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MILADA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VERA CHERNOBYLSKY
VERA CHERNOBYLSKY LAW OFFICES OF VERA CHERNOBYLSKY4623 DUNMAN AVENUEWOODLAND HILLS, CA 91364United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Milk and milk products, excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt; whipped cream; cream, being dairy products; condensed milk; yogurt; kefir being a milk beverage; margarine; butter; buttercream, namely, buttermilk; milk beverages, milk predominating; ryazhenka being fermented baked milk; cheese; whey; smetana being sour cream; soya milk being a milk substitute | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2024 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2024 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2024 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| May 22, 2024 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2024 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Mar 25, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 10, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 6, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 15, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |