Drawing for SAT NAM RASAYAN

USPTO serial 79216988

SAT NAM RASAYAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5952162Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 7, 2020
Examiner
O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SAT NAM RASAYAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H David Starr

H David Starr Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.125 S. Royal StreetAlexandria, VA 22314United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Arranging, conducting and organising educational courses and events in the field of meditation, yoga and healing, as a lifestyle but also in respect to the actual daily practices thereof and techniques therefor and used for cultural or educational purposes for the upliftment, inspiration and betterment of the individual and general community; teaching and training programs in the field of meditation, yoga and healing, as a lifestyle but also in respect to the actual daily practice thereof and techniques therefor; publication of audio and visual media in the field of meditation, yoga and healing via communications networks, namely, providing a website featuring non-downloadable videos and non-downloadable audio recordings in the field of educational information regarding meditation, yoga, and healing, all on-line via a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 2026NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 7, 2026C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 4, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 7, 2026ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2025REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 15, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 8, 2020GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 18, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2020FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 7, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 7, 2020R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 22, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 5, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 5, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 31, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 5, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 28, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 7, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 28, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 29, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
May 29, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 29, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 29, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 4, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 3, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 3, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 3, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 30, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 29, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2017LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance