USPTO serial 79217198
TRIBS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5557702Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 11, 2018
- Examiner
- BAGLINI, KAREN
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with TRIBS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Otto O. Lee
Otto O. Lee INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP LLP1871 THE ALAMEDA, SUITE 250San Jose, CA 95126United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Unprocessed plastics for industrial use; unprocessed polyacrylate resin for optical lenses; unprocessed plastics in all forms; unprocessed acrylic resins; unprocessed artificial and synthetic resins; unprocessed polymer resins; plastics, unprocessed; synthetic resins, unprocessed; unprocessed plastic in the form of powder or granules; unprocessed artificial resins as raw materials in the form of powders, liquids or pastes; unprocessed plastic materials in powder, liquid or paste form; plastics in unprocessed form, in powder, liquid or paste form; unprocessed styrene acrylonitrile resins; acrylonitrile; unprocessed acrylonitrile butadiene styrene resins; unprocessed synthetic resins for use in the manufacture of moulding compounds; polymerization plastics; unprocessed polystyrene resins; unprocessed polyallylate resins; unprocessed synthetic resins | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 26, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 25, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |