USPTO serial 79217304
H HYBRIDSERVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZIMMERMAN, GAYNNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with H HYBRIDSERVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data communication and computer networking equipment; data processing apparatus; computers; computer hardware; computer servers; Cloud servers; computer workstations; central computers; computer parts and components; file servers; database server centers; Internet servers; intranet servers; communication servers (computer hardware); portable computers; network servers; notebook computers; personal computers; process calculators; computer systems; servers for hosting web sites; network accessing server hardware; supercomputers; mobile computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Information technology services; development, programming and implementation of software; development of computer hardware; website hosting services; software as a service SaaS; rental of computer hardware and installations; advice, inquiries and information relating to information technology; computer analysis and diagnostics; research and development as well as implementation of computers and computer systems; management of computer projects; technological services relating to computers; computer network services; monitoring of computer systems by remote access; design and development of operating software for computer networks and servers; rental of operating software for computer networks and servers; hosting of servers; rental of storage space on servers; rental of computers and software; computer system analysis; development of computers; development of computer systems; monitoring of computer systems by remote access; integration of computer systems and networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 17, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 14, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |