Drawing for GINGER PRINCE

USPTO serial 79217565

GINGER PRINCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5671889Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 12, 2019
Examiner
AGREDA, SAMANTHA LEIGH
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with GINGER PRINCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Scott Gerien

J. Scott Gerien DICKENSON, PEATMAN & FOGARTY1500 First Street, Ste 200Napa, CA 94559United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wine other than ginger wineACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 28, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 27, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 31, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 31, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 31, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 12, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 27, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 7, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 12, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Sep 11, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 11, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 11, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 21, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 12, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 11, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 10, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 6, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance