Drawing for QUOSCIENT

USPTO serial 79218062

QUOSCIENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5796447Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 9, 2019
Examiner
MAJCHER HARTNETT, MEGAN K
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUOSCIENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan J. Brushaber

Susan J. Brushaber Reinhardt LLP5613 S. Prince StreetSuite 200Littleton, CO 80120

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Communication by computer terminals providing Internet access; Communications by fibre optic networks; Communications by computer terminals; Telecommunications routing and junction services; Electronic Message sending, namely, providing on-line forums and instant messaging; Electronic Data transmission; Satellite transmission; Information about telecommunication; Rental of modems; Rental of telecommunication equipment; Rental of access time to global computer networks; Providing access to databasesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2026INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 23, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 9, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 26, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 25, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 9, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 25, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 23, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 19, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 3, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 29, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 19, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 18, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 25, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 12, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 10, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 2, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 21, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 21, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 21, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 27, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 10, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 26, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 26, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 24, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 24, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 23, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance