USPTO serial 79218093
CONSIERGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5735954Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 30, 2019
- Examiner
- BROOKSHIRE, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONSIERGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Curtis Krechevsky
Curtis Krechevsky Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Security devices, namely, motion detectors; alarm equipment and warning equipment, namely, hard wired and wireless emergency call monitors, intercoms, smoke detectors which emit a warning sound; alarm sensors; alarm signs, namely, luminous alarm signs, alarm bells, alarm signal receivers and senders; remote alarm annunciators; sirens; solar radiation sensors and detectors; light sensors; computer software for tracking, monitoring, and analysis of the daily routines of the people for safety purposes, not for use as a virtual concierge by hotel guests which provides awareness and information of nearby restaurants, shops, activities, and attractions; control software for tracking, monitoring, and analysis of the daily routines of the people for safety purposes, not for use as a virtual concierge by hotel guests which provides awareness and information of nearby restaurants, shops, activities, and attractions; application software for tracking, monitoring, and analysis of the daily routines of the people for safety purposes, not for use as a virtual concierge by hotel guests which provides awareness and information of nearby restaurants, shops, activities, and attractions; data processing equipment and computers including peripheral devices therefor | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Lighting apparatus, namely, electric lamps and luminaires; LED lamps and LED luminaires and their component parts | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Medical services; medical healthcare services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | Personal background investigations; tracking and location of missing persons using satellite transmission | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OSRAM GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by OSRAM GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by OSRAM GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by OSRAM GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named CONSIERGO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2026 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 10, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 19, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 29, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2018 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 10, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 2, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 2, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2017 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2017 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 28, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |