USPTO serial 79218398
RANGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5893590Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 29, 2019
- Examiner
- AGREDA, SAMANTHA LEIGH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RANGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AU
PORT MELBOURNE VIC 3207, AU
PORT MELBOURNE VIC 3207, AU
PORT MELBOURNE VIC 3207, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew S. Ehard
ANDREW S. EHARD MERCHANT & GOULD, PCP.O. BOX 2910DOCKMPLS@MERCHANTGOULD.COMMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Charging systems for battery operated household or personal appliances comprised of charging appliances for rechargeable equipment; battery packs being battery charge devices for electronic devices in the nature of smartphones, tablets, laptops; battery chargers for personal electronic devices; batteries for personal electronic devices; mounting cradles being mounting devices for electronic devices, namely, smartphones, tablet computers and computers; carrying cases for smart phones, tablet computers, laptops; computer cables; electric charging and data cables for personal electronic devices; wall battery chargers for personal electronic devices; laptop battery chargers; electronic security apparatus for use in homes, namely, security alarms, motion sensitive security lights; security systems for homes comprised of security control panels and motion detectors, security alarm controllers; automated control installations, namely, automated digital controls for thermostats and temperature control devices; apparatus for use in security control, namely, security control panels and motion detectors, security alarm controllers, all for use in homes; electric control apparatus, namely, electrical controlling devices; video cameras adapted for security purposes for household use; all of the foregoing for personal or household use; none of the foregoing for use in, or in connection with passenger vehicles or for industrial purposes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cygnett Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by RANGERCORP GLOBAL PTY. LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by RANGERCORP GLOBAL PTY. LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by RANGERCORP GLOBAL PTY. LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named RANGER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2025 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 22, 2019 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2019 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |