Drawing for MONSTER CLAW CHRONICLES

USPTO serial 79218425

MONSTER CLAW CHRONICLES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIDWELL WALKER, JACLYN NOEMI
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONSTER CLAW CHRONICLES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Game software, including game software for use on mobile phones, tablets and other electronic mobile devices; computer game software; video game softwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Design, development and programming of video game and computer game software; rental of video game and computer game software; providing online non-downloadable software; advisory, consultancy and information services in this class in relation to all of the foregoingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 27, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 26, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 25, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 25, 2018ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 25, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 14, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 1, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 30, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 18, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance