USPTO serial 79218527
THE EIGHTEEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, ELIZABETH A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE EIGHTEEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus
JEFFREY B. SLADKUS THE SLADKUS LAW GROUP1827 POWERS FERRY ROADBUILDING 6, SUITE 200ATLANTA, GA 30339Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Golf courses; golf caddie services; organization of golf tournaments; organization of golf competitions; planning of professional golf tournaments; adjustment of customized golf clubs, namely, fitting of golf clubs to individual users, providing refitting of golf club grips to individual users at the customer's location; provision of golf facilities; golf training course services; rental of golf equipment with the exception of carts | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Providing temporary accommodation; rental of temporary accommodation in vacation homes and apartments; hospitality services in the nature of providing temporary accommodation; hospitality services, namely, restaurants providing food and beverages; tourist home services; catering services for hospitality suites; provision of temporary accommodation as part of hospitality services; hotel services; providing information relating to hotels and temporary accommodation for travelers; resort hotel services; reservation of accommodation in hotels; hotel catering services; advisory services concerning hotel facilities and temporary accommodation in the nature of guesthouses, pensions, all for travelers; restaurant services; cafeterias; canteen services; bar and catering services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2018 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |