USPTO serial 79218638
EDGECASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHADAB, SETH WILLIG
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EDGECASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical enclosures made from sheet steel; cases adapted for electronic circuits; cases adapted for electronic equipment; apparatus for linking computers into networks; apparatus for network communication; apparatus for use in communications networks; communication devices for linking computer networks; computer apparatus for use in local area networks; computer apparatus for use with computer networks; computer network apparatus; computer networking apparatus; local area networking apparatus for the switching of data; local area networking apparatus for the transmission of data; network controlling apparatus; network management apparatus; data packet switching apparatus; data switching apparatus; packet switching apparatus; housings for electronic sub-assemblies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 29, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 29, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 29, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |