USPTO serial 79218823
SHIPYARD GAMES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5472253Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 22, 2018
- Examiner
- MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHIPYARD GAMES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karin Segall
Karin Segall Leason Ellis LLPOne Barker Ave, Fifth floorWhite Plains, NY 10601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Games software; downloadable computer game programs; DVDs, video disks and video tapes with recorded animated cartoons; interactive multimedia computer game programs; computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones; downloadable computer game software via a global computer network and wireless devices | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | Electronic hand-held game units for playing electronic games; electronic games other than those adapted for use with television receivers only; action skill games | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Electronic game services provided by means of the internet; providing on-line interactive computer games; provision of on-line computer games; providing on-line information in the field of computer gaming entertainment; providing an online computer game | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer programming; computer programming and software design; consultancy services relating to computer programming; computer programming of video and computer games; engineering consultancy relating to computer programming; maintenance and updating of computer software; design and development of computer game software; maintenance of websites for others | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shipyard Games
- Other trademarks owned by Shipyard Games
- Other trademarks owned by Shipyard Games
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SHIPYARD GAMES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2026 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2026 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2026 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 6, 2025 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 6, 2024 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 6, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 9, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |