Drawing for DIGITAL REINVENTION

USPTO serial 79218954

DIGITAL REINVENTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5547892Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 28, 2018
Examiner
FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGITAL REINVENTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Valerie Calloway

Valerie Calloway International Business Machines Corp.1 North Castle DriveIntellectual Property- TrademarksArmonk, NY 10504

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware, namely, computers, servers and computer storage apparatus, namely, namely, high-speed storage subsystems for storage and backup of electronic data either locally or via a telecommunications network; computer programs for use in controlling the operation and execution of computer systems, software and networks; computer programs for use in connecting disparate computer networks and systems, servers and storage apparatus; computer operating system software; computer programs for linking together computers and for enabling computing across a global computer network; computer programs for managing systems, software and processes that exist within an information technology environment, instructional manuals sold as a unit therewith; cloud computing system, namely, a network integrating computer hardware and software for dynamic provisioning, virtualization, and consumption metering of computer resourcesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
035Organization and conducting of exhibitions for commercial purposes in the field of computers, information technology and electronic business transactions via a global computer networkSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Computer system integration services; computer consultation services; consulting services relating to the design, selection, implementation and use of computer systems and software for third parties; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computers, servers and computer programs ; computer system design services for others; computer system analysis services; interconnection of computers and computer programs, namely, integration of computer systems and computer networks; computer program and computer hardware testing services, namely, software, computer and server testing; installation, updating and maintenance of computer programs; computer programming services for others; cloud computing services, namely, cloud computing featuring network integrated computer hardware and software used for the dynamic provisioning, virtualization, and consumption metering of computer resourcesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2026INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 13, 2026INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 13, 2026INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 14, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 14, 2025C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 28, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 11, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 28, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 12, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 23, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 8, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 7, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 7, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 25, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 6, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 31, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 28, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 27, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2017LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance