Drawing for TWINJECT

USPTO serial 79219040

TWINJECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5494678Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 19, 2018
Examiner
ALESKOW, DAVID HOWARD
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with TWINJECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Pickerill

John Pickerill FREDRIKSON & BYRON, P.A.60 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500Minneapolis, MN 55402United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Injection moulding machines; plastics injection forming machines; injection stretch blow moulding machines; injectors for engine; injection presses; injection moulds as parts of machines; parts and fittings of all the aforementioned goodsACTIVE—
037Installation, cleaning, repair and maintenance of injection moulding machines; installation, cleaning, repair and maintenance of plastics injection forming machines; installation, cleaning, repair and maintenance of injection stretch blow moulding machines; installation, cleaning, repair and maintenance of injectors for engine; installation, cleaning, repair and maintenance of injection presses; installation, cleaning, repair and maintenance of injection moulds; installation, cleaning, repair and maintenance of parts and fittings of injection moulding machines, plastics injection forming machines, injection stretch blow moulding machines, injectors for engine, injection presses and injection mouldsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2026CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 30, 2024NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 202471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 26, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 22, 2024ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2018FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 22, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 22, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 19, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 3, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2018NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 27, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 14, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 3, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 2, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 25, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance