USPTO serial 79219057
SELFSERVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GULIANO, ROBERT N
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SELFSERVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, including software for billing and customer service systems, billing and customer service procedures and user interfaces; computer software for billing and customer service systems, billing and customer service procedures and user interfaces; computer software for use in hosting computer-implemented billing and customer service systems, software for billing and customer service procedures and user interfaces including a customer administration portal that allows users to manage their own profile and transactions; computer software for processing, analysis, storage, retrieval and transmission of data; computer software for assisting customers to manage their own profile and transactions | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Development, design, implementation and management of computer software and computer-implemented systems, including billing and customer service systems, billing and customer service procedures, portals and user interfaces for and on behalf of others; development, design, implementation and management of computer software and computer-implemented systems for billing and customer service systems, billing and customer service procedures and user interfaces for and on behalf of others; development of software and computer-implemented systems for the processing, analysis, storage, retrieval and transmission of data; technical data analysis services in relation to billing and customer service systems; product development services in relation to computer-implemented billing and customer service systems, billing and customer service procedures and user interfaces; software as a service (saas); cloud computing; technical testing, analysis, evaluation and consultancy services in the field of computer security, relating to the application of industry standards, including privacy and cyber security requirements; designing web portal services; website design for others; technological research relating to computer software design, software for computer user interfaces, software for data processing and analysis, and billing and customer service systems, software for billing and customer service procedures; computer systems analysis in respect of billing and customer service systems and advisory services relating thereto | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2018 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |