USPTO serial 79219106
G
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5557785Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 11, 2018
- Examiner
- POLZER, NATALIE M
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with G?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AT
AT
AT
AT
Nußbach, AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David B. Tingey
David B. Tingey Kirton McConkie36 South State Street, Suite 1900Salt Lake City, UT 84111United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for processing plastic; machine tools for processing plastic; extrusion moulding machines and extrusion installations being parts of machines; injection moulding machines; extrusion tools being parts of machines; machines for the secondary treatment of extruded materials from extruders, in particular haul-offs, machine tool sizers or refrigerators; tools for machines for processing plastics, in particular nozzles for extruders; power-operated separating devices for plastic profiles, in particular saws; machines for processing waste plastics, in particular retruders | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of extrusion tools, extrusion machines and extrusion installations | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technological consultancy in relation to extrusion processes; software development; technological planning in relation to plastics processing installations and machines; engineering services for designing nozzles for extruders and for developing computer programs for calculating and manufacturing the aforesaid nozzles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Exelliq Holding GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Greiner Extrusion Group GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Greiner Extrusion Group GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Greiner Extrusion Group GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Exelliq Austria GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named G
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2025 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2025 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 17, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2024 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 26, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 25, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |