USPTO serial 79219150
SUPERDRANK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, JEANIE H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPERDRANK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Essential oils and aromatic extracts; cleaning and fragrancing preparations; toiletries | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Spectacle cases; spectacle cords; spectacle frames; spectacles; sunglasses; goggles for sports | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewellery; time instruments; jewellery boxes and watch boxes; key rings and key chains and charms therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing; footwear; headgear | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business assistance, management and administrative services;business analysis, research and information services; advertising, marketing and promotional services; retail services in relation to bags; retail services in relation to footwear; retail services in relation to sporting articles; wholesale services in relation to jewellery; wholesale services in relation to toiletries; wholesale services in relation to bags; wholesale services in relation to footwear; wholesale services in relation to sporting articles; wholesale services in relation to clothing; retail store services in the field of clothing; retail store services in the field of clothing; retail services connected with the sale of clothing and clothing accessories; mail order retail services connected with clothing accessories; retail services in relation to clothing accessories; online retail services relating to clothing; online retail services relating to jewellery; online retail services related to handbags; online retail services relating to cosmetics; mail order retail services for clothing; mail order retail services for cosmetics; retail services in relation to fashion accessories; online retail store services relating to clothing; online retail store services relating to cosmetic and beauty products; retail services relating to sporting goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |