Drawing for DORNIER THE GREEN MACHINE

USPTO serial 79219302

DORNIER THE GREEN MACHINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5836716Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 20, 2019
Examiner
JOHNSON II, COLLIER L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DORNIER THE GREEN MACHINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert S. Broder

Robert S. Broder Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576-1614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for the textile industry, namely, weaving machines; couplings and transmission components for machines; gear units, drives and motors and engines for aforesaid machines; parts for weaving machines, namely, leno devices, mechanical and pneumatic inserting devices, selvage tucking devices, shedding devices, weft insertion elements, weft brakes, weft cutting devices and weaving reeds; machines for processing plastics, and plants consisting of coordinated combinations of machines for processing plastics; film stretching machines; coating machines for coating webs, films and fabrics; longitudinal stretching machines for stretching films; transverse stretching machines for stretching films; machines for extruding plastic; parts for plastic processing machines, namely, metering and mixing devices for plastic raw material, dies for extruders, take-up devices, winders, tentering clips; machines and plants consisting of coordinated combinations of machines for producing fiber-composite semi-finished products and fiber-composite components, for use in further manufacturing in various industries; replacement parts, fittings and accessories for all aforesaid goodsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Electronic data processing equipment; electrical/electronic control panels; computer software in the nature of machine operating software for use in operating textile weaving machines, machines for processing plastics and machines for processing fiber-composite materials; all of the aforesaid goods being provided in the field of textile weaving, textile processing, plastics processing and fiber-composite materials processing, none of the aforesaid goods being for land, air and water vehicles, and none of the aforesaid goods being provided in the field of medicine or for medical applicationsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
037Repair, servicing, maintenance, assembly, namely, installation, and modification, namely, refurbishing, refitting, retrofitting, conversion and upgrading of machines for the textile industry, machines and plants consisting thereof for processing plastics, and machines and plants consisting thereof for producing fiber-composite semi-finished products and fiber-composite components; none of the aforesaid services being for land, air and water vehiclesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 20, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 5, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 20, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 20, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 20, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 4, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 15, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 12, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 12, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 12, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 27, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 14, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 14, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 14, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 5, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 8, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 7, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 6, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 27, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance