Drawing for PERTEC

USPTO serial 79219335

PERTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PERTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie B. Seyler

Julie B. Seyler ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Chlorinated rubber; seals; seals for pipe connections; joints not of metal; caulking materials; water-tight rings; washers of rubber; sealing washers; watertight rings for plumbing pipes; elastomer polymers in the form of sheets for use in manufacturing operations; elastomer polymers in the form of blocks for use in manufacturing operations; figurines made of rubber; rubber seals for jars; rubber sheets for sealing; rubber sheets for insulation; clack valves of rubber; sleeves of rubber for protecting parts of machines; rubber bumpers for loading docks; stops of rubber; shock-absorbing buffers of rubber; rings of rubber; rings of rubber for use as pipe connection seals; rubber stoppers for bathtubs; rubber stoppers for showers; rubber stoppers for sinks; rubber stoppers; rubber stoppers for industrial packaging containers; valves of rubber; semi-worked rubber; semi-worked rubber; hydrochlorinated rubber; rubber for use in manufacture operations; rubber, gutta-percha, gum, asbestos, mica being unprocessed or semi-processed and substitutes of all these materials; semi-processed plastics and resins; packing, stopping and insulating materials; non-metallic hoses and pipes; natural rubber; nitrile rubber; raw or partly processed gum; raw or semi-worked rubber; unprocessed rubber; raw rubber; silicone rubber; styrene-butadiene rubber; synthetic rubber; synthetic rubber for use in manufacture operations; door stops of rubber; washers of rubber or vulcanized fiber; uncured synthetic rubber for use in manufacture operations; valves of rubber or vulcanized fiber; bags (envelopes, pouches) of rubber for packaging; packaging materials of rubber; waterproof packings; cylinder jointing; rubber compounds; elastomeric polymers to be used in manufacturing operations (obtained by compression, injection, transfer or extrusion processes)ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 8, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 27, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 29, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 7, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 7, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 23, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 22, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 28, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance