USPTO serial 79219354
RCMON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RCMON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chungcheongnam-do, KR
Chungcheongnam-do, KR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toy construction sets; educational toys being mechanical toys; toy drones; robotic toys; remote controlled action toys; radio-controlled scale model vehicles; battery-operated action toys; toy model train sets; model toy and remote controlled vehicles for children; toy vehicle tracks; mobile toys being remote controlled toy vehicles; pre-fabricated toys being scale model toy kits; toy figures; toys for education being board games and toy robots | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | Online comprehensive shopping mall services being business management services; goods import-export agencies; import agency services; export agency services; import-export agency services; purchasing agency services for games and playthings; wholesale store services for games and playthings; retail store services for games and playthings | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 15, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2018 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Nov 25, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |