USPTO serial 79219419
DELCONTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DELCONTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith A. Weltsch
KEITH A WELTSCH SCULLY SCOTT MURPHY & PRESSER PC400 GARDEN CITY PLAZASUITE 300GARDEN CITY, NY 11530Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Chocolate candies; chocolate; chocolates with cream fillings; pralines made of chocolate; chocolate truffles; chocolate eggs; chocolate Easter eggs; chocolate bars; filled chocolates | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2023 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jun 27, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 24, 2019 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 7, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 2019 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2019 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |