Drawing for EXELCO DIAMOND

USPTO serial 79219438

EXELCO DIAMOND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5478004Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 29, 2018
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXELCO DIAMOND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Liane L. Churney

Liane L. Churney FLYNN, THIEL, BOUTELL & TANIS, P.C.2026 Rambling RoadKalamazoo, MI 49008-1631UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Earrings using diamonds; insignias of precious metal using diamonds; badges of precious metal using diamonds; bonnet pins of precious metal being jewellery using diamonds; tie clips using diamonds; tie pins using diamonds; necklaces using diamonds; bracelets using diamonds; pendants using diamonds; gem brooches using diamonds; medals using diamonds; rings being jewellery using diamonds; lockets using diamonds; bracelets made of embroidered textile being jewellery using diamonds; ornamental lapel pins using diamonds; pins being jewellery using diamonds; chains being jewellery using diamonds; chaplets using diamonds; brooches being jewellery using diamonds; hat jewellery using diamonds; amulets being jewellery using diamonds; misbaha prayer beads using diamonds; rings being jewellery using diamonds; rosaries using diamonds; cuff links using diamonds; diamondsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2026Further Decision Processed by IB—
Feb 4, 2026XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2026INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2026XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Sep 9, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 13, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 29, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 29, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 13, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 21, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 12, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 17, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 7, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 6, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 28, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance