USPTO serial 79219496
CRP THE CORROSION EXPERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5688148Status 707Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 5, 2019
- Examiner
- VAGHANI, MAYUR C
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with CRP THE CORROSION EXPERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Corrosion Resistant Products Limited
GB
Other trademarks owned by Corrosion Resistant Products Limited
Corrosion Resistant Products Limited
Littleborough, Lancashire, GB
Other trademarks owned by Corrosion Resistant Products Limited
Corrosion Resistant Products Limited
GB
Other trademarks owned by Corrosion Resistant Products Limited
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven J. Solomon
Steven J. Solomon Tucker Ellis LLP950 Main Avenue, Suite 1100Cleveland, OH 44113United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal check valves, not being parts of machines; pipes, namely, metal pipes and fluoropolymer lined metal pipes, and the metal valve fittings other than parts of machines for such pipes; metal valves other than parts of machines for controlling the flow of fluids in pipelines; metal valves other than parts of machines for controlling the flow of gases in pipelines; metal and metal alloy valves, not being parts of machines; fluoropolymer lined metal pipes and pipe fittings; metal sampling valves other than parts of machines; all of the foregoing excluding hoses | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Valves, namely, valves, for piping systems in the nature of valves for pumps, valves being parts of machines; mechanical valves for regulating fluid flows, namely, valves for piping systems in the nature of valves for pumps, valves being parts of machines; mechanical valves for regulating gas flows, namely, valves for piping systems in the nature of valves for pumps, valves being parts of machines; metal valves lined with fluoropolymer materials, namely, valves for piping systems in the nature of valves for pumps, valves being parts of machines; fluoropolymer lined check valves, namely, valves for piping systems in the nature of valves for pumps, valves being parts of machines; fluoropolymer lined sampling valves, namely, valves for piping systems in the nature of valves for pumps, valves being parts of machines, valves for reaction and other vessels in the nature of valves for pumps, valves being parts of machines; metal flanged bellows being parts of machines for piping systems with polytetrafluorethylene convolutions; all of the foregoing being for basic chemical, fine chemical, specialty chemical manufacturing, life science product manufacturing, consumer product manufacturing, mining and metal treatment, and for industrial use with corrosive chemicals; all of the foregoing not for use in automobiles; all of the foregoing excluding hoses | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | [Contents gauges, namely, fluoropolymer lined level gauges for tanks, vessels and piping systems] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Corrosion Resistant Products Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Corrosion Resistant Products Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Corrosion Resistant Products Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CRP THE CORROSION EXPERT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2026 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 25, 2025 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2025 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 18, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2018 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Dec 17, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |