Drawing for PET TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 79219509

PET TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5472270Status 707Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 22, 2018
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with PET TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leo V. Gureff

Leo V. Gureff Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C125 S. Royal StreetAlexandria, VA 22033United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Air compressors; ] machines for processing plastics, namely, automatic and semi-automatic production lines for manufacturing plastic packings; devices for the repair and maintenance of plastic packaging production lines, namely automatic blowmolding machines and semi-automatic blowmolding machines [ ; power-operated agricultural implements, namely automatic blowmolding machines and semi-automatic blowmolding machines ]ACTIVE—
042[ Scientific research; surveying; ] [ scientific laboratory services; conducting technical project studies; computer technological consultancy; industrial design ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2026INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 28, 2026INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Mar 2, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 2, 202671.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 24, 2026EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 15, 2025PUMIPROOF OF USE INTERIM ACTION ISSUED—
Sep 9, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 2, 2025EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2025PUM2OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU2—
Dec 3, 2024EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2024PUM1OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1—
Jun 3, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 17, 2024ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 5, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 22, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 22, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 6, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 14, 2018NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 30, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 30, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 30, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 29, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 13, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 3, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 2, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 1, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 30, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance