USPTO serial 79219549
SUPERFIRE BALL FIRE EXTINGUISHING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 13, 2018
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPERFIRE BALL FIRE EXTINGUISHING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
YG YANGIN GÜVENLIGI SANAYI VE DIS TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by YG YANGIN GÜVENLIGI SANAYI VE DIS TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
YG YANGIN GÜVENLIGI SANAYI VE DIS TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by YG YANGIN GÜVENLIGI SANAYI VE DIS TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
YG YANGIN GÜVENLIGI SANAYI VE DIS TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by YG YANGIN GÜVENLIGI SANAYI VE DIS TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rhett V Barney
Rhett V Barney Lee & Hayes PC601 W Riverside Ave Ste 1400Spokane, WA 99201United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Fire extinguishing apparatus, fire engines, fire hose and fire hose nozzles, fire control devices, apparatus and equipment | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by YG YANGIN GÜVENLIGI SANAYI VE DIS TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by YG YANGIN GÜVENLIGI SANAYI VE DIS TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by YG YANGIN GÜVENLIGI SANAYI VE DIS TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SUPERFIRE BALL FIRE EXTINGUISHING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2026 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2026 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2026 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 30, 2025 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 4, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 28, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |