USPTO serial 79219580
AUTO CONCIERGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YOUNG, THOMAS PAUL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUTO CONCIERGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programmes; computer programs; computer software; computer software programmes; computer software programs; computer hardware; electronic databases; software; software for computers; communications equipment; data capture apparatus; data collection apparatus; data processing equipment and accessories (electrical and mechanical); data storage apparatus; computerized vehicle engine analyzers; engine analyzers; engine diagnostic apparatus; measuring, counting, alignment and calibrating instruments; monitoring instruments; sensors and detectors; traffic sign recognition apparatus and instruments; traffic sign recognition systems; control apparatus and instruments; simulation apparatus; simulators | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer analysis; computer design and programming services; computer hardware development; data migration services; data mining; computer systems development; computer research services; computer network services; design and development of electronic database software; development of computer systems; development of computer hardware; development of computer based networks; design and development of wireless data transmission apparatus, instruments and equipment; design and development of wireless data transmission apparatus; development of systems for the transmission of data; development of systems for the processing of data; development of systems for the storage of data; research in the field of data processing technology; technological research relating to data processing; software development, programming and implementation; advisory services relating to scientific research; provision of technological research services; research and development services; technological research services; technical data analysis services; advice relating to the design of computer hardware; advisory services relating to computer systems design; advisory services relating to computer hardware design; computer hardware design services; computer systems design; creating and designing web pages for others; custom design of software services; database design; database design and development; database development services; design and development of networks; design (computer system -); design of computer databases; designing of data processing systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2017 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |