USPTO serial 79219663
MATHAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 26, 2018
- Examiner
- NITKIN, DINISHA F
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MATHAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Belarusian-German Joint Venture "Santa Bremor" Limited Liability Company
Brest, BY
Other trademarks owned by Belarusian-German Joint Venture "Santa Bremor" Limited Liability Company
Belarusian-german joint venture "Santa Bremor" lim
BY
Other trademarks owned by Belarusian-german joint venture "Santa Bremor" lim
Belarusian-German Joint Venture "Santa Bremor" Limited Liability Company
BY
Other trademarks owned by Belarusian-German Joint Venture "Santa Bremor" Limited Liability Company
Belarusian-German Joint Venture "Santa Bremor" Limited Liability Company
BY
Other trademarks owned by Belarusian-German Joint Venture "Santa Bremor" Limited Liability Company
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander Lazouski
Alexander Lazouski Lazouski IP LLCSuite 1, 14726 Bowfin Ter.Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fish, not live; herrings, not live; fish fillets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Belarusian-German Joint Venture "Santa Bremor" Limited Liability Company
- Other trademarks owned by Belarusian-german joint venture "Santa Bremor" lim
- Other trademarks owned by Belarusian-German Joint Venture "Santa Bremor" Limited Liability Company
- Other trademarks owned by Belarusian-German Joint Venture "Santa Bremor" Limited Liability Company
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named MATHAC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 21, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 30, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 24, 2024 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 10, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 14, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |