Drawing for OPTISIZE

USPTO serial 79219747

OPTISIZE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5705759Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 26, 2019
Examiner
CROWLEY, PAUL
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with OPTISIZE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberto Ledesma

Roberto Ledesma Law Office of Roberto LedesmaP.O Box 230692New York, NY 10023United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Food and animal feed supplements containing essential trace minerals; preparations of essential trace minerals for use as dietary supplements and nutritional supplements, all for animal use; animal feed dietary and nutritional supplements comprised of stable, large particle trace minerals that are manufactured by means of an agglomeration process which utilizes a binder to hold smaller mineral crystals in a larger, uniform, stable form that ensures uniform distribution when mixed into premixes and complete animal feedsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 3, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 202571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 30, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 20, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 25, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 26, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 8, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 27, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 26, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 26, 2018CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 21, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 28, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 14, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 13, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 3, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance