Drawing for Serial No. 79220152

USPTO serial 79220152

Serial No. 79220152

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5461529Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 8, 2018
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79220152?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells, Esq.

Nicholas D. Wells, Esq. Legends Law Group, PLLC330 N Main StreetKaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Groats for human food; hominy grits; processed semolina; oatmeal; crushed barley; corn, milled; couscous semolina; rice; flour; wheat flour; cereal preparations, namely, breakfast cereals; muesli; oat-based food, namely, rolled oats; corn chips, cereal products, namely, cereal bars; corn flakes; oat flakes; vermicelli noodles; pasta; macaroni; spaghettiSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
031unprocessed grains for eatingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2026INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 7, 2026XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2026XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jul 22, 2025INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 22, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 8, 2023REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 1, 2018CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Aug 24, 2018CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 23, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 23, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Aug 8, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2018R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 20, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 31, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 12, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 12, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 27, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 5, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 21, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 20, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 11, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 7, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance