USPTO serial 79220182
OPTIMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPTIMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
08645 Bad Elster, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 015 | Musical instruments; string instruments; strings for musical instruments; musical accessories | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 9, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |