USPTO serial 79220317
NUT BREAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5526990Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 31, 2018
- Examiner
- POLZER, NATALIE M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUT BREAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander Lazouski
Alexander Lazouski Lazouski IP LLC14726 Bowfin Terrace, Suite 1Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Chocolate; confectionery made of sugar; peanut confectionery, namely, peanut butter confectionery chips and peanut brittle; sweets | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2026 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 14, 2025 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 20, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 15, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 18, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |