Drawing for HEATWEED TECHNOLOGIES THE DIFFERENCE DEMONSTRATED

USPTO serial 79220358

HEATWEED TECHNOLOGIES THE DIFFERENCE DEMONSTRATED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5753853Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 21, 2019
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEATWEED TECHNOLOGIES THE DIFFERENCE DEMONSTRATED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donna J. Bunton

Donna J. Bunton NIXON & VANDERHYE P.C.901 North Glebe Road, 11th FloorArlington, VA 22203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Scale removing preparations for industrial useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
007Weeding machines and machine tools for weeding; engines other than for land vehicles; machine coupling and transmission components except for land vehicles; agricultural implements other than hand-operated, namely, machines for weed controlSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
035Retail store services featuring scale removing preparations for industrial and domestic household purposes, weeding machines and machine tools, engines other than for land vehicles, machine coupling and transmission components except for land vehicles, agricultural implements other than hand operatedSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific research and development in the field of devices for weed control and design relating thereto; industrial analysis and research services, namely, water quality analysis; research in the field of infrared sensor and vision technology in connection with automatic plant detection; analysis of energy transfer and energy absorption; research services in the nature of technology research in the field of weed controlSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 5, 2026INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 5, 2025C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 21, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 9, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Aug 21, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 26, 2019OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 10, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2019OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 1, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 13, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 8, 2019ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 2, 2018ISSRWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Jul 31, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 27, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 11, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 11, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 28, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 28, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 27, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 30, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 29, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 30, 2017RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2017RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 21, 2017MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 16, 2017RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 15, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 2017NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2017REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance